Jabref will happily link to pdf's that are available, but it is designed as a reference manager first, with the option to link to pdfs. JABREF BETTER OPTION FULLJabref is much more slim and comes a little closer to the philosophy of "do one thing and do it well." But the difference between being loaded with features and being full of bloat is only a matter of whether or not you have a use for those features.Ģ) Jabref allows you to include "notes" in the reference database, but beyond that I don't think it has any annotation features (AFAIK). I think Mendeley is very well done, but it is a large project that offers all sorts of bells and whistles - lots of options. However, regarding JavaFX I don't have any idea whether and how this can be realized.I dabbled with Mendeley a while back, but now use jabref exclusively.ġ) I don't have numbers to back it up now, but I believe your suspicion for #1 is correct. If this is too hard to implement, waiting for the JavaFX migration might be an option. Problem is: I'm not quite sure whether Swing does actually support this behavior out of the box as it is a mixture between fixed widths and automatic scaling to avoid horizontal scrollbars. If there is additional space left the remaining columns could be broadend to use this space.Į.g., all special columns, the # column, entrytype and year have a fixed width - title, author/editor and journal are dynamic and use the remaing space in the table.Īny remarks to this concept? Do you propose another solution?.Columns with fixed size should use those fixed sizes.Each column should have at least its minimal size - if the space is not sufficient, a horizontal scrollbar should be used.ability to define that a column should not be scaled.ability to define a minimal width for each column.In my opinion the best solution would be: It is already possible to define column width in the preferences (-> "Entry table columns") - but these column widths are only used, if "fit table horizontally" is not active. If a single column is resized all other columns are resized, too (to fill the gap, or to create the needed space) - this makes it rather hard to adjust the column width to your preferred style (e.g., year should be just big enough to show all 4 digit year numbers).Īnd: After resizing the JabRef window all adjustments are just gone. However, the current implementation has some drawbacks: I think "fit horizontally" is a sensible default, as free/empty space after all table columns does not make any sense - and normally a horizontal scrollbar is not wished by the users, too. What is the problem with the current solution? It is possible to switch between those two behaviors by changing the preferences in the tab "Entry Table" -> "Fit table horizontally on screen". Table is using fixed widths for each column - if the space is not enough there is a horizontal scrollbar - if there is too much space parts are simply empty.Table is always using the full width of the JabRef window.Generally there are two different options available: The current behavior of the entry main table is rather weird in my opinion:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |